IFRS interpretations (IFRIC) you should know

The standards cannot answer every question, and when the same question keeps coming up, the IFRS Interpretations Committee steps in. Its interpretations are short, binding and easy to overlook, and its agenda decisions have changed practice on topics from cloud software to supplier finance. This guide explains how interpretations and agenda decisions fit into IFRS, lists every interpretation in issue with the question it answers, and works through IFRIC 22 on advance payments in a foreign currency.

By Awais Jameel, Chartered Accountant. Reviewed by Muhammad Bilal, Chartered Accountant. Updated . 8 minute read.

Short answer

IFRIC interpretations are part of IFRS Accounting Standards. They are developed by the IFRS Interpretations Committee and approved by the IASB to answer a specific question that the standards do not settle clearly, and they carry the same authority as the standards. There are 15 IFRIC interpretations and 5 older SIC interpretations from the Standing Interpretations Committee still in issue. The most used include IFRIC 21 Levies, which recognises a levy when the activity that triggers it occurs; IFRIC 22, which uses the exchange rate on the date of an advance payment or receipt; IFRIC 23, which sets out how uncertain tax treatments are reflected; IFRIC 1 for changes in decommissioning liabilities; IFRIC 12 for service concessions; and IFRIC 14 for pension surpluses. No new interpretation has been issued since IFRIC 23 in 2017: the Committee now mostly answers questions through agenda decisions, which explain how existing requirements apply without adding new ones, and which companies are expected to apply with sufficient time to implement them. In this guide's IFRIC 22 example, a machine bought for USD 100,000 with an advance payment costs CU 86,545 rather than CU 90,909.

At a glance

In issue
15 IFRIC, 5 SIC
Status
Part of IFRS
Latest
IFRIC 23, 2017
Since then
Agenda decisions
Agenda decisions
Explain, not amend
Most used
IFRIC 21, 22 and 23
IFRS interpretations (IFRIC) you should knowIn issue: 15 IFRIC, 5 SIC; Status: Part of IFRS; Latest: IFRIC 23, 2017; Since then: Agenda decisions; Agenda decisions: Explain, not amend; Most used: IFRIC 21, 22 and 23.KEY FACTS AT A GLANCEIFRS interpretations (IFRIC) you should knowIn issue15 IFRIC, 5 SICStatusPart of IFRSLatestIFRIC 23, 2017Since thenAgenda decisionsAgenda decisionsExplain, not amendMost usedIFRIC 21, 22 and 23Tax BakersIFRS interpretations (IFRIC) you should knowIn issue: 15 IFRIC, 5 SIC; Status: Part of IFRS; Latest: IFRIC 23, 2017; Since then: Agenda decisions; Agenda decisions: Explain, not amend; Most used: IFRIC 21, 22 and 23.KEY FACTS AT A GLANCEIFRS interpretations (IFRIC) youshould knowIn issue15 IFRIC, 5 SICStatusPart of IFRSLatestIFRIC 23, 2017Since thenAgenda decisionsAgenda decisionsExplain, not amendMost usedIFRIC 21, 22 and 23Tax Bakers
Key facts at a glance, as set out in this guide.

What are IFRIC and SIC interpretations?

The IFRS Interpretations Committee is the IASB's body for questions about how the standards apply in practice. When a widespread question has diverse practice and can be answered within the existing standards, it can develop an interpretation, which is exposed for comment, finalised by the Committee and approved by the IASB. The interpretations are numbered IFRIC 1 onwards; those issued before 2002 by its predecessor, the Standing Interpretations Committee, are numbered SIC. Under IAS 8, interpretations rank with the standards themselves, so a company that does not apply one cannot say it complies with IFRS. Interpretations that are no longer needed are withdrawn or replaced by amendments, which is why the numbers have gaps.

How do agenda decisions fit in?

Where interpretations sit in IFRSWhere interpretations sit in IFRSIFRS and IAS standardsSet the requirements, approved by the IASBIFRS 15, IAS 16InterpretationsIFRIC and SIC: part of the standardsIFRIC 23Agenda decisionsExplain how the standards already applyCloud software, 2021Educational materialHelps apply the standards; no new rulesClimate examples
Interpretations bind like standards; agenda decisions explain them.

When the Committee decides not to add a question to its agenda, it publishes an agenda decision explaining why, often with an analysis of how the existing requirements apply to the facts. Agenda decisions do not change the standards and have no effective date, but they can change practice, and companies are expected to apply them with sufficient time to implement any change, usually months rather than years. Well-known examples include the 2019 and 2021 decisions on cloud computing, which led many companies to expense software configuration costs they had capitalised, the 2020 decision on supplier finance arrangements, and the April 2024 decision on climate-related commitments under IAS 37. See the Conceptual Framework and IAS 8, which covers how to account for a change in policy that follows an agenda decision.

Which interpretations are in issue?

InterpretationSubjectThe question it answersGuide
IFRIC 1Changes in existing decommissioning, restoration and similar liabilitiesHow changes in the estimate or discount rate adjust the related assetDecommissioning costs
IFRIC 2Members' shares in co-operative entitiesWhen members' shares that can be redeemed are equityIAS 32 debt or equity
IFRIC 5Rights to interests in decommissioning fundsHow a contributor accounts for its interest in a separate fundMine rehabilitation
IFRIC 6Waste electrical and electronic equipmentWhen the obligation for historical household equipment arisesIAS 37 provisions
IFRIC 7Applying the restatement approach under IAS 29How to restate in the first year an economy is hyperinflationaryIAS 21 vs ASC 830
IFRIC 10Interim financial reporting and impairmentGoodwill impairments recognised at an interim date are not reversedIAS 34 interim reporting
IFRIC 12Service concession arrangementsHow operators of public infrastructure, such as toll roads, account for itIFRS 15 revenue
IFRIC 14The limit on a defined benefit asset and minimum fundingHow much of a pension surplus can be recognisedIAS 19 employee benefits
IFRIC 16Hedges of a net investment in a foreign operationWhich risks and which group entities qualify in a net investment hedgeIFRS 9 hedge accounting
IFRIC 17Distributions of non-cash assets to ownersDividends in kind are measured at the fair value of the assetsIFRS 5 vs ASC 205-20
IFRIC 19Extinguishing financial liabilities with equity instrumentsShares issued to settle debt are measured at fair value, with a gain or lossIFRS 9 derecognition
IFRIC 20Stripping costs in the production phase of a surface mineWhen waste removal costs become an assetStripping costs
IFRIC 21LeviesA levy is recognised when the activity that triggers it occursIAS 34 vs ASC 270
IFRIC 22Foreign currency transactions and advance considerationThe exchange rate for an item paid for in advance is the rate on the payment dateIAS 21 foreign currency
IFRIC 23Uncertainty over income tax treatmentsHow to reflect tax positions the tax authority may not acceptIFRIC 23 explained
SIC-7Introduction of the euroHow IAS 21 applied to the changeover to the euroNone
SIC-10Government assistance with no specific relation to operating activitiesSuch assistance is a government grant under IAS 20IAS 20 grants
SIC-25Changes in the tax status of an entity or its shareholdersThe tax effects of a change in status go to profit or loss, unless they relate to equity itemsIAS 12 income taxes
SIC-29Service concession arrangements: disclosuresWhat operators and grantors disclose about concessionsNone
SIC-32Intangible assets: web site costsWhich website development costs can be capitalisedIAS 38 intangibles

IFRIC 22 in practice: an advance payment in a foreign currency

A company whose functional currency is the CU orders a machine for USD 100,000. It pays a 40% advance of USD 40,000 on 1 March, when USD 1.25 buys CU 1, and the machine is delivered on 1 June, when the rate is USD 1.1, with the balance of USD 60,000 payable later.

Part of the priceRate usedCU
Advance of USD 40,000, a non-monetary prepayment1.25, the date it was paid32,000
Balance of USD 60,000, a monetary payable1.1, the delivery date54,545
Cost of the machine86,545

The prepayment is a non-monetary asset, so it is not retranslated: when the machine arrives, it simply becomes part of the machine's cost at the rate on 1 March. Had the whole price been translated on delivery, the cost would have been CU 90,909. The balance is a monetary payable, retranslated at each reporting date until it is paid, with differences in profit or loss. The same logic applies to a customer's advance for revenue, which is recognised at the rate on the date the advance was received. See IAS 21 foreign currency.

Why does IFRIC 21 matter for interim reports?

IFRIC 21 recognises a levy, such as a property tax or a bank levy imposed by law, when the activity that triggers it occurs, not spread over the year. A levy triggered by owning property on 1 January is recognised in full on that date, so a company reporting quarterly shows the whole cost in its first quarter. US GAAP spreads property taxes over the year, so this is one of the clearest interim differences. See IAS 34 vs ASC 270.

Does US GAAP have interpretations?

The FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force played a similar role for US GAAP, and its consensuses, once ratified by the FASB, are issued as Accounting Standards Updates and become part of the Codification, so there is no separate body of interpretations. SEC staff guidance applies to public companies. See what is US GAAP and every IFRS and IAS explained in one line.

Keep going

Our free Excel models work through the examples in these guides, and the comparisons show where IFRS and US GAAP part ways. Every guide names the Chartered Accountant who wrote it and the one who reviewed it.

Questions people ask

What is an IFRIC interpretation?

Guidance developed by the IFRS Interpretations Committee and approved by the IASB that answers a specific question about applying IFRS Accounting Standards; it has the same authority as the standards.

How many IFRIC interpretations are there?

15 IFRIC interpretations and 5 SIC interpretations are in issue; IFRIC 23, issued in 2017, is the most recent.

Are IFRIC agenda decisions mandatory?

They do not add requirements, but they explain how the standards apply, so a company whose policy conflicts with one is expected to change it, with sufficient time to implement the change.

What does IFRIC 22 say?

For a foreign currency transaction with an advance payment or receipt, the exchange rate is the one on the date the advance was paid or received, because the prepayment or deferred income is a non-monetary item.

Sources

The standards, updates and other documents this guide draws on.

  1. IFRS Foundation: list of IFRS Accounting Standards and Interpretations
  2. IFRS Interpretations Committee: Customer's right to receive access to the supplier's software hosted on the cloud (March 2019)
  3. IFRS Foundation: Climate-related Commitments (IAS 37), agenda decision, April 2024
  4. EY: IFRS Update of standards and interpretations in issue at 30 June 2026

Rules and fees change. If you are reading this long after October 26, 2026, confirm the figures with the source before you rely on them.

More in Accounting standards

This guide is general information. It is not tax or legal advice for your situation.