What kinds of buyback arrangement are there?
IFRS 15 distinguishes three forms. A forward is an obligation on the carmaker to repurchase; a call option is the carmaker's right to repurchase; a put option is the customer's right to require the carmaker to repurchase. Fleet contracts with rental companies are usually puts, sometimes combined with an obligation for the rental company to return the vehicles within a window. The terms that matter are the repurchase price compared with the original price and with the vehicle's expected market value, and the length of time before the buyback.
What if the carmaker must or can buy the vehicle back?
With a forward or call option, the customer cannot direct the use of the vehicle or obtain substantially all its remaining benefits, because the carmaker can take it back. So control has not passed and there is no sale. If the repurchase price is less than the original price, the arrangement is a lease, accounted for under IFRS 16; if it is equal to or more than the original price, it is a financing arrangement, with the carmaker keeping the vehicle and recognising a financial liability. See consignment, bill-and-hold and repurchase agreements.
What if the customer can sell the vehicle back?
With a put option, the carmaker assesses at inception whether the customer has a significant economic incentive to exercise it. The main factor is how the repurchase price compares with the vehicle's expected market value at the exercise date; the time until exercise also matters. If the guaranteed price is well above the expected market value, the customer will almost certainly return the vehicle, so the arrangement is a lease, or a financing if the repurchase price is at least the original price and above the expected market value. If there is no significant incentive, the transaction is a sale with a right of return: revenue is recognised, less the expected returns, with a refund liability and an asset for the vehicles expected back.
Buyback guarantees: a fleet sale that is a lease
A carmaker sells a vehicle that cost US$ 20,000 to build to a rental company for 25,000, and guarantees to buy it back after 9 months for 19,000. The vehicle's expected market value at that point is 17,500, so the rental company has a significant economic incentive to return it, and because 19,000 is below 25,000, the arrangement is a lease.
| US$ | If treated as a sale | As a lease |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue at delivery | 25,000 | None |
| Lease income over 9 months | None | 6,000 |
| Cost of sales at delivery | (20,000) | None |
| Depreciation over 9 months | None | (2,500) |
| Loss on buyback (19,000 paid for a vehicle worth 17,500) | (1,500) | None |
| Total profit | 3,500 | 3,500 |
As a lessor, the carmaker keeps the vehicle on its balance sheet and depreciates it to its expected value of 17,500. The 25,000 received is split: 19,000 is a liability for the repurchase, and 6,000 is prepaid rent, recognised as lease income over the 9 months. Total profit is the same either way, but lease accounting removes 25,000 of revenue at delivery and spreads the margin over the lease. See lessor accounting.
What about residual value guarantees without a buyback?
Some carmakers do not take vehicles back but guarantee the buyer, or a bank financing the buyer, a minimum resale value, paying any shortfall. Without a repurchase, the customer obtains control, so the vehicle is sold. The guarantee is then assessed separately: often it is variable consideration, because it is in effect a price adjustment to the customer, estimated and constrained at the time of sale; where it guarantees another party's loss, it may be a financial guarantee or a provision. Carmakers' captive finance companies carry similar residual value risk on their operating leases; see captive finance and leasing.
How are buyback arrangements presented?
Vehicles under buyback leases are usually shown as vehicles on operating leases within property, plant and equipment or as a separate line, with the repurchase obligations as liabilities. Carmakers disclose the volume of fleet sales with buyback commitments, because a fall in used car prices increases losses on vehicles returned. When the vehicles come back, they are transferred to inventory at their carrying amount and sold through used car channels.
How does US GAAP differ?
ASC 606 contains the same repurchase guidance, leading to operating leases under ASC 842 for most guaranteed fleet buybacks. US carmakers have long accounted for fleet sales with guaranteed repurchase as operating leases, so the answer under both frameworks is similar. See automotive accounting.
Need help applying the standards?
Our Chartered Accountants help finance teams and students apply IFRS and US GAAP to real transactions.
Questions people ask
Is a vehicle sale with a buyback guarantee revenue under IFRS 15?
Not if the carmaker must or can buy it back, or the customer has a significant economic incentive to sell it back; then it is a lease or financing.
When is a buyback arrangement a lease rather than financing?
When the repurchase price is below the original selling price; at or above it, it is financing.
How is a significant economic incentive assessed?
Mainly by comparing the guaranteed repurchase price with the vehicle's expected market value at the exercise date.
What happens if there is no significant incentive to return the vehicle?
It is a sale with a right of return: revenue less expected returns, with a refund liability.
Sources
Every fee, date and rule on this page was taken from these official and primary sources.
- IFRS Foundation: IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
- IFRS Foundation: IFRS 16 Leases
- FASB Accounting Standards Codification: Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers
- Financial Accounting Standards Board: Revenue recognition
Rules and fees change. If you are reading this long after October 9, 2026, confirm the figures with the source before you rely on them.
Related guides
More in Automotive
This guide is general information. It is not tax or legal advice for your situation.