ASC 810 consolidation explained

Consolidation under US GAAP turns on a question IFRS answers differently: which model applies? This guide explains the two ASC 810 models, why majority voting interest matters more than under IFRS, the consolidation procedures, and how ownership changes are accounted for.

By Mirza Fahad Baig, Chartered Accountant. Reviewed by Hamza Fida, Chartered Accountant. 3 minute read.

Short answer

ASC 810 is the US GAAP topic on consolidation. A reporting entity consolidates another legal entity in which it has a controlling financial interest. US GAAP uses two models: the variable interest entity (VIE) model, applied first, under which the primary beneficiary consolidates; and the voting interest model, under which control usually means owning a majority of the voting interest. Consolidated financial statements combine the parent and its subsidiaries, eliminate intercompany items and present noncontrolling interest within equity.

At a glance

Consolidate when
Controlling financial interest
First model
Variable interest entity (VIE)
Second model
Voting interest
Voting model control
Usually over 50% of votes
De facto control
Not recognized under the voting model
Noncontrolling interest
Within equity
ASC 810 consolidation explainedConsolidate when: Controlling financial interest; First model: Variable interest entity (VIE); Second model: Voting interest; Voting model control: Usually over 50% of votes; De facto control: Not recognized under the voting model; Noncontrolling interest: Within equity.KEY FACTS AT A GLANCEASC 810 consolidation explainedConsolidate whenControlling financialinterestFirst modelVariable interest entity(VIE)Second modelVoting interestVoting model controlUsually over 50% of votesDe facto controlNot recognized under thevoting modelNoncontrolling interestWithin equityTax BakersASC 810 consolidation explainedConsolidate when: Controlling financial interest; First model: Variable interest entity (VIE); Second model: Voting interest; Voting model control: Usually over 50% of votes; De facto control: Not recognized under the voting model; Noncontrolling interest: Within equity.KEY FACTS AT A GLANCEASC 810 consolidation explainedConsolidate whenControlling financial interestFirst modelVariable interest entity (VIE)Second modelVoting interestVoting model controlUsually over 50% of votesDe facto controlNot recognized under the voting modelNoncontrolling interestWithin equityTax Bakers
Key facts at a glance, as set out in this guide.

Which ASC 810 consolidation model applies?

Which consolidation model applies?Which consolidation model applies?Is the legal entity a variableinterest entity (VIE)?YesVIE model: primarybeneficiary consolidatesNoDoes the company hold a majorityvoting interest, without vetoes?NoDo notconsolidateYesConsolidate under the voting interest model
The VIE model always comes first.

The VIE model is assessed first. Only if the legal entity is not a VIE, or a scope exception applies, does the reporting entity use the voting interest model. See variable interest entities.

How does the voting interest model work?

A majority voting interest, directly or indirectly more than 50% of the outstanding voting shares, is generally a controlling financial interest. Control can be overcome when noncontrolling shareholders have substantive participating rights, such as the right to approve the annual budget or the hiring of senior management. For limited partnerships and similar entities, the general partner does not consolidate unless the limited partners lack substantive kick-out or participating rights, in which case the partnership is usually a VIE.

Does US GAAP recognize de facto control?

Not under the voting interest model. An investor with 45% of the votes and thousands of small shareholders holding the rest would usually not consolidate under US GAAP, although under IFRS 10 it might have de facto control. This is one of the main practical differences between the two frameworks. See control under IFRS 10.

What are the consolidation procedures?

  • Combine the financial statements of the parent and subsidiaries line by line.
  • Eliminate intercompany balances and transactions, including unrealized profit in inventory.
  • Present the noncontrolling interest within equity, separately from the parent's equity, and attribute net income and comprehensive income to it.
  • Use the same reporting period, or one ending within about three months, with disclosure of significant intervening events.

The mechanics match IFRS; see a consolidation example.

How are changes in ownership treated?

Changes in a parent's ownership that do not result in loss of control are equity transactions: no gain or loss, and the carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest is adjusted. When control is lost, the parent deconsolidates the subsidiary, measures any retained investment at fair value, and recognizes a gain or loss in net income.

What are kick-out and participating rights?

Kick-out rights let other investors remove the decision maker, such as a general partner, without cause; participating rights let them block or participate in significant financial and operating decisions made in the ordinary course of business. Substantive rights of either kind held by noncontrolling investors can prevent a majority holder or general partner from consolidating. Protective rights, such as approval of an asset sale outside the ordinary course, do not.

What if there is no controlling financial interest?

Investments giving significant influence, generally 20% to 50% of the voting stock, are accounted for using the equity method under ASC 323. Smaller investments in equity securities are measured at fair value through net income under ASC 321, with a measurement alternative for investments without readily determinable fair values.

What are common ASC 810 mistakes?

Applying the voting interest model before checking whether the entity is a VIE; treating protective rights as participating rights; and overlooking related parties and de facto agents, whose interests must be considered together with the reporting entity's in the VIE model.

Are there private company alternatives?

Yes. Private companies may elect not to apply the VIE guidance to legal entities under common control when certain conditions are met, for example a property-holding company owned by the same shareholders as the operating company that leases the property, with disclosure instead. See ASC 805 business combinations.

Need help applying the standards?

Our Chartered Accountants help finance teams and students apply US GAAP and IFRS to real transactions.

Questions people ask

What is ASC 810?

The US GAAP topic on consolidation, under which a reporting entity consolidates legal entities in which it has a controlling financial interest.

What are the two consolidation models in ASC 810?

The variable interest entity model, applied first, and the voting interest model.

Does US GAAP recognize de facto control?

Not under the voting interest model; a controlling financial interest generally requires more than 50% of the votes.

How are noncontrolling interests presented under US GAAP?

Within equity, separately from the parent's equity, with net income attributed to them.

Sources

Every fee, date and rule on this page was taken from these official and primary sources.

  1. FASB Accounting Standards Codification: Topic 805, Business Combinations
  2. FASB Accounting Standards Codification: Topic 810, Consolidation

Rules and fees change. If you are reading this long after October 4, 2026, confirm the figures with the source before you rely on them.

More in ASC 805 and 810

This guide is general information. It is not tax or legal advice for your situation.