How is control under IFRS 10 assessed?
- Power: rights that give the current ability to direct the relevant activities, those that most significantly affect the investee's returns, such as selling products, managing assets, or approving budgets and funding. Only substantive rights count; protective rights, such as a lender's veto over major asset sales, do not give power.
- Variable returns: dividends, changes in the value of the investment, fees, tax benefits or synergies that can vary with performance.
- Link: the investor uses its power for its own benefit, as a principal, not on behalf of others as an agent.
Control examples
| Situation | Control? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Holds 60% of the votes; decisions by simple majority | Yes | Majority voting power |
| Holds 45%; the remaining 55% is spread among thousands of small shareholders who rarely vote together | Likely yes: de facto control | Its holding is large relative to the others and dispersed holders are unlikely to outvote it |
| Holds 40% plus currently exercisable, in-the-money options to buy another 15% | Likely yes | Substantive potential voting rights count |
| Holds 70% but the investee is in liquidation run by a court-appointed liquidator | No | The liquidator directs the relevant activities |
| A fund manager holds 2% of a fund, earns a market-rate fee and can be removed by investors without cause | No: agent | Small exposure and substantive removal rights point to an agent |
How does de facto control work?
An investor without a majority of votes can still have power if its rights are sufficient to direct the relevant activities unilaterally in practice. IFRS 10 considers the size of its holding relative to others, how dispersed the other holdings are, potential voting rights, contractual arrangements, and voting patterns at previous shareholder meetings. The judgement is disclosed under IFRS 12. US GAAP does not recognise de facto control under its voting interest model; see ASC 810.
What are structured entities?
Entities designed so that voting rights are not the dominant factor in deciding who controls them, such as securitisation vehicles or some investment funds, where activities are directed by contracts. US GAAP calls similar entities variable interest entities. Control is assessed by looking at the purpose and design of the entity, who directs the activities that remain, and who is exposed to the returns, including through guarantees or subordinated interests.
Does a franchisor control its franchisees?
Usually not, even for a large franchise network. A franchisor's rights to protect its brand, such as setting standards and inspecting outlets, are protective rights designed to protect the brand rather than to direct the franchisee's relevant activities, such as setting prices, hiring staff and financing the business. Unless the franchisor has other rights or exposure, the franchisee is not consolidated.
When is control reassessed?
Whenever facts and circumstances indicate that one or more of the three elements has changed: a change in shareholdings, the expiry of options, new contracts, or a change in how decisions are made. Control can be gained or lost without any change in the investor's own shareholding, for example when another holder sells down.
What if there is no control?
Joint control is accounted for under IFRS 11, significant influence (usually 20% to 50% of votes) under IAS 28 using the equity method, and smaller holdings as financial assets under IFRS 9. See IFRS 10 explained and a consolidation example.
Need help applying the standards?
Our Chartered Accountants help finance teams and students apply IFRS and US GAAP to real transactions.
Questions people ask
What are the three elements of control under IFRS 10?
Power over the investee, exposure or rights to variable returns, and the ability to use power to affect those returns.
Can an investor control an entity with less than 50% of the votes?
Yes, through de facto control, substantive potential voting rights or contractual arrangements.
What are relevant activities?
The activities of the investee that most significantly affect its returns, such as operating, investing and financing decisions.
Does a fund manager control the funds it manages?
Usually not if it is an agent: small exposure to returns and substantive rights for investors to remove it point to agency.
Sources
Every fee, date and rule on this page was taken from these official and primary sources.
Rules and fees change. If you are reading this long after October 4, 2026, confirm the figures with the source before you rely on them.
Related guides
More in IFRS 10
This guide is general information. It is not tax or legal advice for your situation.