Co-manufacturing arrangements

Many consumer goods companies make part of their range in other companies' factories, to add capacity, use a specialist process or produce close to a market. The contracts look like supply agreements, but they often contain a lease, hold the brand owner's materials in someone else's warehouse and commit it to minimum volumes for years. This guide explains when a co-manufacturing contract contains a lease, works through a dedicated line over five years, and covers inventory, buy-back of materials, minimum volumes, equipment paid for by the brand owner, the co-manufacturer's revenue and US GAAP.

By Mirza Fahad Baig, Chartered Accountant. Reviewed by Hamza Fida, Chartered Accountant. 6 minute read.

Short answer

Co-manufacturing arrangements, where a brand owner pays a contract manufacturer or co-packer to make its products, raise four main accounting questions. First, whether the contract contains a lease: if a production line is dedicated to the brand owner, it takes all the output and it decides what is made and when, IFRS 16 usually treats the line as leased, and the brand owner recognises a right-of-use asset and a lease liability. Second, who owns the ingredients and finished goods at the co-manufacturer's site. Third, how minimum volume commitments and shortfall fees are treated, including onerous contracts. Fourth, how the co-manufacturer recognises its revenue, often over time. In this guide's example, a dedicated filling line produces a lease liability of US$ 1,264 thousand.

At a glance

Dedicated line
May be an embedded lease
Lease test
Identified asset, benefits, direction
Lease liability
Fixed payments for the line
Per-unit fees
Expensed, often into inventory
Materials supplied
Usually stay the brand owner's
Co-packer revenue
Often over time
Co-manufacturing arrangementsDedicated line: May be an embedded lease; Lease test: Identified asset, benefits, direction; Lease liability: Fixed payments for the line; Per-unit fees: Expensed, often into inventory; Materials supplied: Usually stay the brand owner's; Co-packer revenue: Often over time.KEY FACTS AT A GLANCECo-manufacturing arrangementsDedicated lineMay be an embedded leaseLease testIdentified asset,benefits, directionLease liabilityFixed payments for thelinePer-unit feesExpensed, often intoinventoryMaterials suppliedUsually stay the brandowner'sCo-packer revenueOften over timeTax BakersCo-manufacturing arrangementsDedicated line: May be an embedded lease; Lease test: Identified asset, benefits, direction; Lease liability: Fixed payments for the line; Per-unit fees: Expensed, often into inventory; Materials supplied: Usually stay the brand owner's; Co-packer revenue: Often over time.KEY FACTS AT A GLANCECo-manufacturing arrangementsDedicated lineMay be an embedded leaseLease testIdentified asset, benefits, directionLease liabilityFixed payments for the linePer-unit feesExpensed, often into inventoryMaterials suppliedUsually stay the brand owner'sCo-packer revenueOften over timeTax Bakers
Key facts at a glance, as set out in this guide.

What is co-manufacturing?

A brand owner outsources production of some products to a co-manufacturer, also called a contract manufacturer or co-packer. The contract sets the recipe, packaging and quality standards, the prices, usually a conversion fee per unit plus materials, and often minimum volumes. Some arrangements share the co-manufacturer's general capacity with other customers; others dedicate a line, a room or a whole plant to one brand owner, sometimes with equipment the brand owner paid for. Each of these features affects the accounting. See FMCG accounting.

When does a co-manufacturing contract contain a lease?

Under IFRS 16, a contract contains a lease if it conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period in exchange for consideration. For a co-manufacturing contract, three questions matter:

  • Is there an identified asset? A specific line, explicitly named or implicitly the only one that can do the work, with no substantive right for the co-manufacturer to switch to another line. A share of a line's capacity is not an identified asset unless it is substantially all of it.
  • Does the brand owner obtain substantially all the economic benefits? It does if it takes all, or nearly all, of the line's output.
  • Does the brand owner direct how and for what purpose the line is used? It does if it decides what products are made, when and in what quantities, or if those decisions are fixed in advance and the brand owner designed the line.

If the co-manufacturer runs the line for several customers and decides its own schedule, there is no lease, just a supply contract. See identifying a lease.

Co-manufacturing: a dedicated line over five years

A beverage brand owner signs a 5-year contract with a co-packer. A specified filling line is used only for its products, and the brand owner sets the weekly production plan and the products to be filled. The co-packer operates and maintains the line. The brand owner pays a fixed capacity fee of US$ 500 thousand a year in arrears, plus a conversion fee per unit filled, plus materials at cost. Based on standalone prices, 60% of the fixed fee, 300 thousand a year, is for the use of the line and 200 thousand is for operating and maintenance services. The brand owner's incremental borrowing rate is 6%.

Lease cost of the line and the cash paid each year (US$ thousand)Lease cost of the line and the cash paid each year (US$ thousand)329300Year 1315300Year 2301300Year 3286300Year 4270300Year 5DepreciationInterestLease payment
Interest makes the cost higher in early years than the cash paid.
YearDepreciationInterestTotalLease paymentLease liability at year end
1252.775.8328.63001,039.5
2252.762.4315.1300801.9
3252.748.1300.9300550.0
4252.733.0285.7300283.0
5252.717.0269.73000.0

At the start, the brand owner recognises a lease liability and right-of-use asset of 1,263.7 thousand, the present value of 5 payments of 300 thousand. Depreciation of 252.7 thousand a year, the 200 thousand of services and the per-unit conversion fees are production costs, so they are included in the cost of inventory under IAS 2 and reach profit or loss through cost of sales. The per-unit fees are variable payments that do not depend on an index or rate, so they are not part of the lease liability. Interest is a finance cost, presented in the financing category once IFRS 18 applies. If the brand owner elected not to separate the service element, the whole 500 thousand fee would be treated as a lease payment and the liability would be 2,106.2 thousand.

Who owns the inventory at the co-manufacturer?

Ingredients and packaging that the brand owner buys and sends to the co-manufacturer usually remain its inventory, because it keeps control of them; the co-manufacturer provides a conversion service, and the finished goods belong to the brand owner as they are made. Some contracts instead have the brand owner sell its materials to the co-manufacturer and buy them back inside the finished products. If the brand owner is obliged or entitled to buy back the finished goods, IFRS 15 treats this as a repurchase agreement: the co-manufacturer does not obtain control of the materials, so the brand owner keeps them in inventory, recognises no revenue on the sale and treats any cash received as a financing liability. The brand owner's cost of inventory includes the materials, conversion fees, depreciation of any right-of-use asset or equipment used, and freight to its warehouses.

What about minimum volumes and shortfall fees?

Many contracts require the brand owner to buy a minimum volume or pay a shortfall fee. Where the contract contains a lease, the fixed payments are already in the lease liability. Where it does not, shortfall fees are expensed when the shortfall occurs. If the brand owner discontinues a product but remains committed to minimum volumes, the unavoidable costs of the non-lease parts of the contract may exceed the benefits, making the contract onerous and requiring a provision under IAS 37, while any right-of-use asset is tested for impairment under IAS 36. See onerous contracts.

Who accounts for equipment the brand owner pays for?

Brand owners often pay for specialised moulds, filling heads or packaging equipment installed at the co-manufacturer. If the brand owner controls the equipment, for example it holds title, can remove it and restricts its use to its own products, the equipment is its property, plant and equipment, and its depreciation is a production cost. If the co-manufacturer controls it and the brand owner's payment is in effect an advance on future fees, the payment is a prepayment, or part of the lease analysis if the equipment forms part of a dedicated line. See customer-owned tooling and supplier tooling.

How does the co-manufacturer recognise revenue?

Products made to the brand owner's recipe and in its branded packaging usually have no alternative use to the co-manufacturer. If the contract also gives the co-manufacturer an enforceable right to payment for work completed to date, including a reasonable margin, IFRS 15 requires revenue to be recognised over time as the products are made, rather than on delivery, so work in progress becomes a contract asset rather than inventory. If the arrangement contains a lease, the co-manufacturer is a lessor and splits the fees between lease income under IFRS 16 and service revenue under IFRS 15. See over time or at a point in time.

How does US GAAP differ?

ASC 842 identifies embedded leases using the same three questions. The main difference is the cost profile: if the lease is an operating lease, the brand owner recognises a single straight-line lease cost of 300 thousand a year rather than depreciation and interest, still included in inventory cost where it relates to production. The option not to separate service elements is also available. See ASC 842 leases.

Need help applying the standards?

Our Chartered Accountants help finance teams and students apply IFRS and US GAAP to real transactions.

Questions people ask

When does a co-manufacturing contract contain a lease?

When a specified line is dedicated to the brand owner, it takes substantially all the output and it directs what is made and when.

Are per-unit conversion fees part of the lease liability?

No. Fees that vary with units produced are variable payments not based on an index or rate, so they are expensed, usually through inventory cost.

Who owns materials supplied to a co-manufacturer?

Usually the brand owner, which keeps control; a sale and buy-back of the materials is a repurchase agreement, not a sale.

Does a co-packer recognise revenue over time?

Often yes, if the products have no alternative use to it and it has an enforceable right to payment for work completed to date.

Sources

Every fee, date and rule on this page was taken from these official and primary sources.

  1. IFRS Foundation: IFRS 16 Leases
  2. IFRS Foundation: IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
  3. IFRS Foundation: IAS 2 Inventories
  4. FASB Accounting Standards Codification: Topic 842, Leases
  5. Financial Accounting Standards Board: Leases

Rules and fees change. If you are reading this long after October 10, 2026, confirm the figures with the source before you rely on them.

More in FMCG

This guide is general information. It is not tax or legal advice for your situation.