IAS 40 vs US GAAP: investment property

A real estate company reporting under IFRS can show its buildings at market value, with gains and losses in profit, while a US company with the same buildings shows depreciated cost. This guide compares IAS 40 with US GAAP side by side, works through a fall in a building's value under the IFRS fair value model, the IFRS cost model and US GAAP, and covers impairment reversals, disclosures, transfers and leased property.

By Muhammad Bilal, Chartered Accountant. Reviewed by Awais Jameel, Chartered Accountant. Updated . 6 minute read.

Short answer

IAS 40 vs US GAAP differs in a basic way: IFRS has a separate category for investment property, land and buildings held to earn rentals or for capital appreciation, and lets companies choose a fair value model, with changes in profit or loss and no depreciation, or a cost model with fair value disclosed. US GAAP has no investment property category. Rental real estate is property, plant and equipment under ASC 360, carried at cost less depreciation, unless the owner is an investment company measuring its investments at fair value. Impairment differs too: IFRS compares the carrying amount with the recoverable amount and can reverse an impairment later, while US GAAP first tests recoverability against undiscounted cash flows, writes down to fair value only if that test fails, and never reverses. US GAAP also does not require the fair value of rental property to be disclosed. In this guide's example, a fall in a building's value produces an impairment of $7 million under the IFRS cost model and none under US GAAP.

At a glance

Category
IFRS only
Fair value model
IFRS only
Depreciation
Cost models only
US impairment test
Undiscounted cash flows
Reversals
IFRS only
Fair value disclosed
IFRS cost model
IAS 40 vs US GAAP: investment propertyCategory: IFRS only; Fair value model: IFRS only; Depreciation: Cost models only; US impairment test: Undiscounted cash flows; Reversals: IFRS only; Fair value disclosed: IFRS cost model.KEY FACTS AT A GLANCEIAS 40 vs US GAAP: investment propertyCategoryIFRS onlyFair value modelIFRS onlyDepreciationCost models onlyUS impairment testUndiscounted cash flowsReversalsIFRS onlyFair value disclosedIFRS cost modelTax BakersIAS 40 vs US GAAP: investment propertyCategory: IFRS only; Fair value model: IFRS only; Depreciation: Cost models only; US impairment test: Undiscounted cash flows; Reversals: IFRS only; Fair value disclosed: IFRS cost model.KEY FACTS AT A GLANCEIAS 40 vs US GAAP: investmentpropertyCategoryIFRS onlyFair value modelIFRS onlyDepreciationCost models onlyUS impairment testUndiscounted cash flowsReversalsIFRS onlyFair value disclosedIFRS cost modelTax Bakers
Key facts at a glance, as set out in this guide.

How does each framework classify rental property?

Under IAS 40, investment property is land or a building, or part of one, held by the owner or a lessee to earn rentals, for capital appreciation, or both, rather than for use in the business or for sale in the ordinary course. Under US GAAP, the same property is simply property, plant and equipment, alongside the owner's offices and factories. US investment companies, including many real estate funds, measure their investments at fair value under ASC 946 instead. See IAS 40 investment property.

IAS 40 vs US GAAP: what are the differences?

IAS 40 vs US GAAP at a glanceIAS 40 vs US GAAP at a glanceTOPICIFRSUS GAAPInvestment property categoryRequiredNot allowedFair value through profitAllowedNot allowedFair value disclosed at costRequiredNot requiredImpairment reversalAllowedNot allowedLessee ROU at fair valueAllowedNot allowed
IFRS can show market values; US GAAP shows depreciated cost.
AreaIAS 40US GAAP
Measurement after recognitionChoice for all investment property: fair value model or cost modelCost less depreciation under ASC 360, unless an investment company
Fair value changesIn profit or loss under the fair value model, with no depreciationNot recognized
ImpairmentCost model: carrying amount compared with recoverable amount, the higher of value in use and fair value less costs of disposalRecoverability test against undiscounted cash flows; if it fails, write down to fair value
Reversal of impairmentAllowed under the cost modelNot allowed for assets held and used
Fair value disclosureRequired under the cost modelNot required
Leased property held by a lesseeA right-of-use asset can be investment property, at fair value under the fair value modelRight-of-use asset at cost under ASC 842

An example: an office building falls in value

An owner holds an office building for rent with a carrying amount of $40 million under cost-based accounting. Vacancies rise. Its fair value falls to $32 million, or $31.5 million after costs of disposal; its value in use is $33 million; and the undiscounted rental cash flows over its remaining life are $45 million. All amounts are in $ million.

IFRS, fair value modelIFRS, cost modelUS GAAP
TestNone: remeasure to fair valueRecoverable amount, the higher of 31.5 and 33: 33Undiscounted cash flows of 45 exceed 40: recoverable
Loss in profit or loss870
Carrying amount323340
If values recover next yearGain through profit or lossImpairment reversed, up to depreciated costNo reversal; nothing to reverse

Under US GAAP the building stays at $40 million because its undiscounted cash flows still cover the carrying amount, even though it is worth less. Had those cash flows fallen below $40 million, the write-down would have gone all the way to fair value, $32 million, and could never be reversed. See ASC 360 impairment and IAS 36 impairment.

How do transfers and sales differ?

IAS 40 has specific rules for transfers into and out of investment property, made only when there is evidence of a change in use, with fair value differences on owner-occupied property moving to investment property treated like a revaluation. US GAAP has no such transfers, because the category does not exist; property to be sold is classified as held for sale under ASC 360 when the criteria are met, and stops being depreciated. See IFRS 5 held for sale.

Which IFRS model do real estate companies choose?

Most listed property companies reporting under IFRS use the fair value model, so their profit includes valuation gains and losses and they usually present an adjusted earnings measure excluding them. The choice must be applied to all investment property. See fair value or cost for investment property and property valuations under IFRS 13.

Where to go next

See IFRS vs US GAAP key differences.

Keep going

Our free Excel models work through the examples in these guides, and the comparisons show where IFRS and US GAAP part ways. Every guide names the Chartered Accountant who wrote it and the one who reviewed it.

Questions people ask

Does US GAAP have investment property?

No. Rental real estate is property, plant and equipment under ASC 360, carried at cost less depreciation, unless the owner is an investment company.

Can investment property be carried at fair value under US GAAP?

Only by investment companies measuring their investments at fair value; other owners use cost less depreciation.

How does impairment of rental property differ under IFRS and US GAAP?

IFRS compares the carrying amount with the recoverable amount and allows reversals; US GAAP first tests against undiscounted cash flows, writes down to fair value only if that fails, and never reverses.

Must the fair value of investment property be disclosed?

Under IAS 40's cost model, yes. US GAAP does not require fair value disclosure for real estate held and used.

Sources

The standards, updates and other documents this guide draws on.

  1. IFRS Foundation: IAS 40 Investment Property
  2. FASB Accounting Standards Codification: Topic 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment
  3. Financial Accounting Standards Board

Rules and fees change. If you are reading this long after October 24, 2026, confirm the figures with the source before you rely on them.

More in IFRS vs US GAAP

This guide is general information. It is not tax or legal advice for your situation.