Is a mining joint arrangement a joint operation or a joint venture?
First, there must be joint control: decisions on the mine's relevant activities, such as approving the mine plan, budgets and major capital spending, require the unanimous consent of the parties sharing control. Then, if the mine is not held through a separate vehicle, the arrangement is a joint operation. If it is held through a company, it is a joint venture unless its legal form, the contractual terms or other facts and circumstances give the parties rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities.
When is an incorporated mine a joint operation?
When the parties are obliged to take substantially all of the vehicle's output, and the vehicle depends on them for the cash to settle its liabilities, the parties in substance have rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities. In 2015 the IFRS Interpretations Committee confirmed that this assessment looks at whether the facts create enforceable rights and obligations, and that selling the output to the parties at market prices does not by itself prevent the arrangement being a joint operation. Smelters, processing plants and mines set up to supply their owners often meet this test.
Mining joint arrangements: the same mine both ways
A mining company is owned 60% by partner A and 40% by partner B. It has assets of US$ 1,000 million and liabilities of 300 million. In the year it produces concentrate at a cost of 200 million, including depreciation, and sells it all to the partners in proportion at the market price of 350 million. Partner A sells its share on to smelters at the same price.
| Partner A, US$ million | Joint operation | Joint venture, equity method |
|---|---|---|
| Mine assets | 600 | None |
| Liabilities | (180) | None |
| Investment in joint venture | None | 420 |
| Revenue from sales to smelters | 210 | 210 |
| Cost of sales | (120), its share of production cost | (210), concentrate bought from the JV |
| Share of profit of joint venture | None | 90 |
| Profit | 90 | 90 |
Profit and revenue are the same, but as a joint operator A shows 600 million of mine assets and 180 million of liabilities, a gross margin on its own production, and its share of the mine's depreciation in cost of sales. Under the equity method it shows one investment line and buys its concentrate at market price. If A had not yet resold the concentrate, the equity method would eliminate its share of the joint venture's unrealised profit.
How does a joint operator recognise revenue?
Only for output it has transferred to its own customers. In 2019 the IFRS Interpretations Committee confirmed that a joint operator recognises revenue only for the output it has transferred to its customers, not for its share of output that it has not sold. Where the joint operation sells its output to the partners themselves, each partner's revenue comes from its own onward sales. Where partners take output in kind and lift unevenly, imbalances are accounted for separately. See overlift and underlift.
How are earn-in arrangements accounted for?
In an earn-in, a company acquires an interest in a project by funding exploration or development spending in stages, for example earning 51% by spending US$ 50 million over three years. During the earn-in, the project owner usually records no gain for spending funded by the partner, and the earning party capitalises its spending under its exploration policy. Once the interest is earned and joint control exists, each party applies IFRS 11. See exploration and evaluation in mining.
What if a partner buys a bigger interest?
Buying an interest in a joint operation that is a business is accounted for using IFRS 3's principles: assets and liabilities at fair value, goodwill, deferred tax and acquisition costs expensed. Previously held interests in the joint operation are not remeasured if joint control continues. If a partner gains control, the mine becomes a subsidiary and is consolidated. See IFRS 3 explained.
How does US GAAP compare?
US GAAP allows proportionate consolidation of undivided interests in extractive industries, which gives a similar result to a joint operation, and equity accounting for incorporated joint ventures. It has no equivalent of IFRS 11's look-through to output and funding for incorporated vehicles. See joint operating agreements in oil and gas and mining accounting.
Need help applying the standards?
Our Chartered Accountants help finance teams and students apply IFRS and US GAAP to real transactions.
Questions people ask
Is an unincorporated mining joint venture a joint operation?
Yes. Partners owning undivided interests have rights to the assets and obligations for the liabilities, so they account for their shares directly.
Can an incorporated mining company be a joint operation?
Yes, if the partners are obliged to take substantially all its output and are in substance its only source of cash to settle liabilities.
Does a joint operator recognise revenue on its share of production?
No. It recognises revenue only for output it has transferred to its own customers.
How is buying a larger interest in a joint operation accounted for?
If the joint operation is a business, using IFRS 3's principles, with no remeasurement of the interest already held while joint control continues.
Sources
Every fee, date and rule on this page was taken from these official and primary sources.
- IFRS Foundation: IFRS 11 Joint Arrangements
- IFRS Interpretations Committee: Classification of joint arrangements (March 2015)
- IFRS Interpretations Committee: Sale of output by a joint operator (March 2019)
Rules and fees change. If you are reading this long after October 7, 2026, confirm the figures with the source before you rely on them.
Related guides
More in Mining
This guide is general information. It is not tax or legal advice for your situation.