How does a sale and leaseback work?
Is the transfer a sale?
The seller applies the IFRS 15 rules on when control of an asset passes. If the seller has a right or obligation to buy the asset back, control has not passed and there is no sale. A leaseback alone does not prevent a sale, unless it is in substance a financing arrangement, for example a leaseback covering almost the whole remaining life of the asset.
A worked example: telecom towers
An operator sells a portfolio of towers with a carrying amount of CU 600 million to a tower company for CU 1000 million, their fair value. It leases space on the towers back for ten years; the present value of the lease payments, at market rates, is CU 400 million. The transfer meets the IFRS 15 criteria for a sale.
- The total gain would be CU 1000 million less CU 600 million = CU 400 million.
- The operator keeps rights worth CU 400 million of the towers' CU 1000 million value, or 40%.
- Right-of-use asset: 40% of the CU 600 million carrying amount = CU 240 million.
- Gain recognised: only on the 60% transferred, so CU 400 million x 60% = CU 240 million.
Debits of CU 1240 million equal credits of CU 1240 million. The CU 160 million of gain not recognised now is effectively spread over the lease through lower depreciation of the right-of-use asset.
What if the price is not fair value?
If the sale price or the lease payments are not at market rates, the seller adjusts the figures. A price below fair value is treated as a prepayment of lease payments; a price above fair value is treated as extra financing from the buyer, recorded as a financial liability.
How is the lease accounted for afterwards?
Like any other lessee lease, with one restriction added in 2022 and effective from 2024: when the seller-lessee remeasures the lease liability, it must not recognise any gain or loss relating to the right of use it kept. This matters when leaseback payments are variable.
What happens if it is not a sale?
The seller continues to recognise the towers and depreciates them as before. The cash received is a financial liability under IFRS 9, and the payments to the buyer are split into interest and repayment of that liability. The buyer records a financial asset rather than the towers.
How does US GAAP compare?
ASC 842 also requires a sale under ASC 606, but if the transaction is a sale, the seller recognises the full gain immediately, subject to off-market adjustments. That is one of the larger practical differences between the two lease standards; see IFRS vs US GAAP: the key differences.
Need help applying the standards?
Our Chartered Accountants help finance teams and students apply IFRS and US GAAP to real transactions.
Questions people ask
How is a sale and leaseback accounted for under IFRS 16?
If the transfer is a sale under IFRS 15, the seller recognises a right-of-use asset for the rights kept and only the gain on the rights transferred.
How is the right-of-use asset measured in a sale and leaseback?
At the proportion of the asset's previous carrying amount that relates to the right of use retained.
What if the sale in a sale and leaseback is not a sale?
The seller keeps the asset and recognises the cash received as a financial liability.
Does US GAAP treat sale and leaseback gains the same way?
No. Under ASC 842 the full gain is generally recognised when the transfer is a sale.
Sources
Every fee, date and rule on this page was taken from these official and primary sources.
Rules and fees change. If you are reading this long after October 4, 2026, confirm the figures with the source before you rely on them.
Related guides
More in IFRS 16
This guide is general information. It is not tax or legal advice for your situation.